| Author | Message | ||
     Naa_collector Message Board Member Username: Naa_collector Post Number: 6048 Registered: 06-2009  |
Obama: After my election, I have more flexibility. | ||
| Redhawk4 Message Board Member Username: Redhawk4 Post Number: 3057 Registered: 02-2009  |
Nothing like publicizing your weaknesses on the world stage. | ||
| 22man Message Board Member Username: 22man Post Number: 479 Registered: 10-2011 |
The President has already set so many things in motion with his czars, agencies, regulations, and judicial appointments,,,,, I don't want to entertain how far he would go if reelected.  There's a news story that reports Obama and Hillary are allowing Russia to take ownership of multiple Alaskan islands and the seabed resources around them.... | ||
| Naa_collector Message Board Member Username: Naa_collector Post Number: 6050 Registered: 06-2009 |
Dare we take a guess at Obama's "more flexible gun plans?" This "flexibility" quote needs to be spread across the gun culture. We need to stop this man. | ||
| Heyjoe Message Board Member Username: Heyjoe Post Number: 2676 Registered: 02-2009  |
The problem with Romney is the same can be said for him. After the republican primaries i have more flexibility aka etch a sketch. | ||
| Naa_collector Message Board Member Username: Naa_collector Post Number: 6051 Registered: 06-2009 |
Joe, do you mean with regard to gun laws? | ||
| Whitehorse Message Board Member Username: Whitehorse Post Number: 915 Registered: 09-2011  |
http://mittromneycentral.com Santorum's profane and unpresidential tantrum with the NYT's reporter is also going viral. Seems the media smells blood in the water over at Rick's campaign qoute from Fidler on the roof . . . "May God bless and keep Barack Obama and Rick Santorum . . . far away from us ! .............................................................  | ||
| Louiethelump Message Board Member Username: Louiethelump Post Number: 2808 Registered: 12-2010 |
STOP Mis-qouting (your spelling) Fidler on the roof I THINK you meant "Quote from Fiddler On The Roof..." No big surprise here is there? You are going to look even more stupid if Santorum ends up being the nominee, or more likely you are going to look REALLY stupid when Romney IS the nominee (I believe this will happen) and then gets TROUNCED by Barack Obama in November. (I also believe THIS will happen even though the wife the kids the dogs and I are all going to vote for him early and often) We are getting set for a rerun of 2008. A weak, mamby pamby sorta Republican Candidate takes a beating at the hands of the Democrats due to the wishes of the so-called "moderates". | ||
| Heyjoe Message Board Member Username: Heyjoe Post Number: 2679 Registered: 02-2009 |
In regards to everything. He will shift towards the center after he becomes the nominee. It will happen count on it. That is the plan. He has also proven in Massachusetts that he will cut deals if politically expedient. If it applies that in Massachusetts he had to take liberal positions in order to govern the same can be said to be a probability as president. IM not saying that he shouldnt ultimately be the nominee based on the field but admit what you are dealing with. If such positions were taken in order to govern in the past, the same is certainly possible for the future. | ||
| Naa_collector Message Board Member Username: Naa_collector Post Number: 6057 Registered: 06-2009 |
Joe, that might be the ONLY way we're gonna win against Obama. Do you think someone as conservative as Santorum can win against Obama? That's just crazy. If Santorum says that Romney is like Obama and Romney is WOMPING ON Santorum, it would follow that Obama would do the same, especially when the Demoncrats get to vote in the matter. | ||
| Whitehorse Message Board Member Username: Whitehorse Post Number: 916 Registered: 09-2011 |
Many tanks, oh great hall moniter I feel more secure with my hall pass just knowing you are there to correct its spellings. again, many tanks Strange how you are calling it a mis-quote. Could you explain ? Are you just upset Obama's and Santorum's videos are at the top of the news ? | ||
| Uncle_lee Message Board Member Username: Uncle_lee Post Number: 2200 Registered: 09-2009  |
"He will shift towards the center after he becomes the nominee. It will happen count on it. That is the plan." That is like thinking a Chihuahua will become a coon dog after you buy it. He is on the left and will move more so if elected. He is where he is only to get good people to vote for him. | ||
| Chopprs Message Board Member Username: Chopprs Post Number: 6553 Registered: 09-2009  |
Dar, I am beginning to get worried about you. I really hope Romney wins as I think you may jump from a bridge is he doesn't.....you have become quite passionate about Romney, to the point that some of your posts about him border on being reasonable.... like you have decided that he has already won and to discuss otherwise is stupid. There "ARE" other candidates and there is also a good chance that Romney may not ge the nomination. Will you be ok if he doesn't? | ||
| Whitehorse Message Board Member Username: Whitehorse Post Number: 938 Registered: 09-2011 |
Choppers, I'm really beginning to worry about you Will you and your "happy" email buddies that read your posts for amusement purposes be upset when Romney takes Obama the rumored "happy" Muslim out of the WH? | ||
| Naa_collector Message Board Member Username: Naa_collector Post Number: 6107 Registered: 06-2009 |
Thanks for your concern, Chopprs. I'm glad you care!  There's a good chance that Romney will NOT be the nominee? I think anybody who says that is kidding themselves. I agree with a LOT of the "news" guys on TV out there, including those on MSNBC, CNN, and FoxNews. Mitt's our man--whether you like it or not. I'm not saying that just because I support him. I honestly see no other path for any other candidate to the nomination. The writing is on the wall. To say otherwise is just wishful thinking for those who don't like him (and I must admit that I still don't fully understand why--but that's politics). If someone else DOES get the nomination, will I support them? Absoutely. Just after I pull myself up off the floor from fainting like a teenage girl at a rock concert. I'm so confident of this, that I'd bet my NAA collection against anybody else's--that is, if I was a bettin' Mormon and it was legal in my conservative state. ;) Haven't we seen even Santorum and Gingrich say they would also support Romney if he was the candidate? And you know how they hate him. I will support the non-Obama candidate--even though my vote in Utah won't mean anything, because whomever the Republican candidate will be, he will take Utah by a landslide. | ||
| Heyjoe Message Board Member Username: Heyjoe Post Number: 2693 Registered: 02-2009 |
you think that Santorum and Gingrich hate Romney? you use that term a lot for people who dont support his candidacy. What you are not getting is that Santorum or Gingrich want to be president. they must beat Romney and all of the other candidates to get there. they will attack and pick apart other candidates words, actions, and writings to do so. There is no hate involved. its politics. People can disagree or not care for Romneys political record without hating him. You dont understand why some of the more conservative side of the republican party doesnt like him? Again they dont dislike him as a person, they do not like his record as governor of Massachusetts for a starter. they do not think that he is a conservative. they do not trust him in the future to follow the policies they ascribe to. they do not like the fact that he will move to the center once he gets the nomination. its really pretty simple. no great mystery. | ||
| Naa_collector Message Board Member Username: Naa_collector Post Number: 6112 Registered: 06-2009 |
I do believe Gingrich hates Romney. I honestly believe that Gingrich thinks if it were not for Romney, he, Gringrich, would be riding the wave of wins and delegate instead of Romney, and that he would be President Elect by November. That's an irrational belief, but I think Ginrich believes it, despite that he probably has surperior intellect when compared to Romney. Gingrich will not be President soly because of Romney--I really think that's what he believes. I'm not so sure about Santorum. It's hard to see where his anger is--and he has plenty. I'm not sure if it's toward Romney or toward something else, because he's just not winning like the thinks he could. But, he's doing much better than he ever expected, while Gingrich is doing much worse that he ever expcted. | ||
| Lohman446 Message Board Member Username: Lohman446 Post Number: 1940 Registered: 10-2010 |
I think Gingrich feels he was "stabbed in the back" in Iowa. Gingrich started preaching about a "clean" campaign and for whatever reason believed the others had agreed to no attack ads. I don't recall that anyone gave him a reason to think that him stating it made it that way but I think he did. For some reason (again why I do not understand) he seemed actually surprised by the attacks in Iowa and took them personally. | ||
| Naa_collector Message Board Member Username: Naa_collector Post Number: 6114 Registered: 06-2009 |
Yeah, I agree with all of that, Lohman. I also think that of ALL of the candidates, Gingrich had the most to lose from negative adds--because he has the most sordid past. (And I think maybe he knew this, hence his committment to keep the campaign positive.) He also kept trying to resurrect himself with all of his talk of success stories from the 90's, but I believe it was that very past that killed him as a Presidential candidate. Of course, he will never see it that way, as intelligent as he is; his ego won't let him. | ||
| Whitehorse Message Board Member Username: Whitehorse Post Number: 942 Registered: 09-2011 |
Lohman446, you do realize Gingrich was attacking with his right hand in Iowa while he was telling lies out of the left side of his mouth. | ||
| Lohman446 Message Board Member Username: Lohman446 Post Number: 1941 Registered: 10-2010 |
I don't think the numbers will support that statement Whitehorse, at least not through Iowa. I don't think negative ads are a bad thing though and when I make the above statement it is a statement of fact without judgement. | ||
| Redhawk4 Message Board Member Username: Redhawk4 Post Number: 3069 Registered: 02-2009 |
 | ||
| Whitehorse Message Board Member Username: Whitehorse Post Number: 943 Registered: 09-2011 |
An inability to understand why Gingrich was saying he did not want what he termed as a "negative campaign" out of the right side of his mouth does bring one's political judgement into question. | ||
| Lohman446 Message Board Member Username: Lohman446 Post Number: 1943 Registered: 10-2010 |
You have now offered the premise twice and I have only questioned it once. Show me the factual basis for it if you would please. | ||
| Whitehorse Message Board Member Username: Whitehorse Post Number: 944 Registered: 09-2011 |
I have only questioned your political judgement once. I promise to point it out from this point forward and there's no need to say please. | ||
| Lohman446 Message Board Member Username: Lohman446 Post Number: 1944 Registered: 10-2010 |
Your premise is based on a stated fact - that stated fact is that Gingrich was attacking Romney while calling for a positive campaign. Surely you can give some evidence to what you stated as fact. | ||
| Naa_collector Message Board Member Username: Naa_collector Post Number: 6117 Registered: 06-2009 |
Actually, if you just went by what the candidates themselves have said, both Santorum and Gingrich have been terribly negative; whereas Romney has rarely said negative things, and most of the cases where he has was in the debates, when he finally realized that not defending himself was a road to a loss. He's generally VERY generous when commenting on fellow candidates. Of course, the Super Pac that is supporting Romney has been terribly negative. And I think we're all kidding ourselves if we don't think the candidates have any influence on what these Super PACs broadcast--even if they don't have direct communication. Of course, having not been in a state that has had their primary or caucus, I can't say much on what ads ANY of the candidates has aired. Utah might as well be in outer space. | ||
| Lohman446 Message Board Member Username: Lohman446 Post Number: 1945 Registered: 10-2010 |
This is how logical debate gets somewhere. You state a premise. The rest of us either accept it or challenge it. In the end we are left with a strong premise. You combine a series of strong premises into an argument and form a conclusion. As long as that conclusion follows the normal rules of logic it should be a valid conclusion. Premises of fact need to be based on supportable fact. If we are allowed to simply make up whatever facts we want with no basis for them we cannot have a strong premise. Without strong premises we cannot have a strong argument. Logical debate prevents us from starting a discussion that goes like a "was not" "was too". Collector: I think you are right about that. For the most part Romney has handled this pretty well. He has been able to stand up and stay mostly positive while letting his super-PACs do the dirty work. As you noted though I think they are tied together. | ||
| Naa_collector Message Board Member Username: Naa_collector Post Number: 6119 Registered: 06-2009 |
Wow, Russia REALLY DOES want Obama BACK for FOUR MORE YEARS! http://www.weeklystandard.com/blogs/pravda-mitt-romney-out-touch-out-date-unelectable_634772.html New Romney slogan: "Piss off the Russians: VOTE FOR MITT!" | ||
| Whitehorse Message Board Member Username: Whitehorse Post Number: 945 Registered: 09-2011 |
Lohman446, If I may point out your faulty political judgement for the now second time. Where did I make an inference that Gingrich was attacking Romney ? Wasn't Santorum Gingrich's immediate rival at that moment ? | ||
| Lohman446 Message Board Member Username: Lohman446 Post Number: 1947 Registered: 10-2010 |
"you do realize Gingrich was attacking with his right hand in Iowa while he was telling lies out of the left side of his mouth." - Whitehorse Ok, before it gets edited again and twisted... ok. Show me. I think your trying to twist the argument and avoid the idea that you flat out misrepresented facts to form a premise. Show me the attacks in Iowa Show me where the quoted premise is based on fact. | ||
| Whitehorse Message Board Member Username: Whitehorse Post Number: 946 Registered: 09-2011 |
Why won't you answer the question ? " Wasn't Santorum Gingrich's immediate rival at that moment ? " You will find your premise and faulty political judgement if you are honest with yourself. | ||
| Lohman446 Message Board Member Username: Lohman446 Post Number: 1949 Registered: 10-2010 |
Because when you offer a premise you are supposed to be prepared to defend it. You offered the premise based on fact - those facts were challenged. Surely you can point to those facts for us and where they are reported and accurate. | ||
| Whitehorse Message Board Member Username: Whitehorse Post Number: 947 Registered: 09-2011 |
Lohmann446, Wasn't I the one that challenged your comment at 11:32 AM ? Back your premise up with facts or state that you are giving your opinion based on your faulty political judgement. Tanks | ||
| Lohman446 Message Board Member Username: Lohman446 Post Number: 1951 Registered: 10-2010 |
What part are you questioning? That Gingrich seemed genuinely surprised that he was being attacked? I didn't argue that he should have been surprised I argued that he seemed surprised - I even think I noted that he had no reason to be surprised. | ||
| Lohman446 Message Board Member Username: Lohman446 Post Number: 1952 Registered: 10-2010 |
Collector offered the conclusion "I do believe Gingrich hates Romney" He offered a series of premises that supported it. I offered another supporting premise. I'm not sure if you are challenging the validity of the premise or the validity of the conclusion. I thought he and I were having a reasonably logical discussion | ||
| Westerly1965 Message Board Member Username: Westerly1965 Post Number: 2423 Registered: 09-2010  |
Don't worry Lohman Whitehorse isn't sure what he is challenging either! | ||
| Louiethelump Message Board Member Username: Louiethelump Post Number: 2820 Registered: 12-2010 |
Whitehorse is truly STUPID isn't he/she? It is getting worse I think. | ||
| Heyjoe Message Board Member Username: Heyjoe Post Number: 2698 Registered: 02-2009 |
yes true, but which makes him all the more entertaining | ||
| Louiethelump Message Board Member Username: Louiethelump Post Number: 2822 Registered: 12-2010 |
That is a point Joe. I guess I should just look at him as entertainment, like old Jerry Lewis skits............ We did not expect much other than a laugh from the old gags so I guess it fits. | ||
| Whitehorse Message Board Member Username: Whitehorse Post Number: 948 Registered: 09-2011 |
web search : gingrich , constant offensive Those that understand politics know that Gingrich was the one attacking. Romney used that knowledge to beat Ginrich.  | ||
| Naa_collector Message Board Member Username: Naa_collector Post Number: 6126 Registered: 06-2009 |
LOL. | ||
| Lohman446 Message Board Member Username: Lohman446 Post Number: 1953 Registered: 10-2010 |
http://articles.latimes.com/2011/dec/22/nation/la-na-iowa-ad-blizzard-20111223 "That makes Gingrich by far the most besieged candidate of the 2012 presidential cycle" Read the article. At least through Iowa Gingrich was the most attacked in the Republican primary. Not vague web searches with no real information or cherry picked information. Emperical data to support the premises I stated. | ||
| Naa_collector Message Board Member Username: Naa_collector Post Number: 6127 Registered: 06-2009 |
Thank goodness, Lohman. I can't imagine Gingrich doing better than he did. At least than train was derailed before it crashed in a ball of flames. | ||
| Naa_collector Message Board Member Username: Naa_collector Post Number: 6128 Registered: 06-2009 |
THIS IS UTTERLY UNBELIEVABLE!!! The Whitehouse is now claiming that the mandate part of the health care law was put in there by the Republicans and was the conservatives' idea in this "bi-partisan bill." Now who's the liar? And the Whitehouse has changed the name of "Mandate" to "Personal Responsibility Clause". Un-fricken-believable. http://freebeacon.com/white-house-tries-to-rebrand-mandate/ | ||
| Louiethelump Message Board Member Username: Louiethelump Post Number: 2823 Registered: 12-2010 |
Yup. That info was out last night. You must have missed it. Romney is a Republican. He has been supportive of a mandate from his MA days. His former team helped with Obamacare. So, isn't it really true? THIS is what you can expect should Romney be the nominee. This bending will be verified and repeated by the press. | ||
| Lohman446 Message Board Member Username: Lohman446 Post Number: 1954 Registered: 10-2010 |
Not a single republican voted for the bill in current form I need to correct that - Joseph Cao voted for it - there was one Republican vote. I could not find any more | ||
| Naa_collector Message Board Member Username: Naa_collector Post Number: 6131 Registered: 06-2009 |
I noticed both the arguing lawyer and Justice Kagan mention Romneycare as the basis for Obamacare during the Supreme Court hearings on the health care law. Nice how they stuck that in there to jab at Romney, eh? I bet they were pretty proud of themselves for that insertion into the official transcripts. | ||
| Lohman446 Message Board Member Username: Lohman446 Post Number: 1955 Registered: 10-2010 |
Romneycare was partially tbe basis for Obamacare and Romney needs to figure out a way to address the issue. | ||
| Louiethelump Message Board Member Username: Louiethelump Post Number: 2825 Registered: 12-2010 |
Romney's former advisers went to work for Obama and assisted with the writing of it. It is different for a state to do it than the Federal Govt., but it is still going to be a problem for him. | ||
| Whitehorse Message Board Member Username: Whitehorse Post Number: 951 Registered: 09-2011 |
Lou, Obama's toast ! | ||
| Naa_collector Message Board Member Username: Naa_collector Post Number: 6133 Registered: 06-2009 |
Romneycare is reportedly 70 pages. Obamacare is 2700 pages. So it would seem they've gone WELL BEYOND what Romney and his Demoncratic legislature proposed. | ||
| Tranquilo Message Board Member Username: Tranquilo Post Number: 1090 Registered: 06-2009 |
bho and putin - comrades helping each other. No surprise. | ||
| Naa_collector Message Board Member Username: Naa_collector Post Number: 6139 Registered: 06-2009 |
True that, Tranq. Obama is better buddies with the Russians than our long-term ally Israel. Ironic. Why didn't we see a "hot-mic" shot during the recent Israel news? Didn't happen, that's why. | ||
| Redhawk4 Message Board Member Username: Redhawk4 Post Number: 3085 Registered: 02-2009 |
Of course the Russians like Obama, while they are not the super power they once were since the break up of the communist block, they still seem to like to meddle in all sorts of things around the world and usually have something going with our enemies. It obviously would suit them to have a US President whose foreign policies are weak because they are diluted by the fact that he seems to want to undermine the US, and see our enemies succeed, as much as they do. | ||
| Bud Message Board Member Username: Bud Post Number: 2110 Registered: 10-2009 |
CLICK AND WATCH THE SHORT VIDEO. This took real guts on Voight's part and he probably just ended his career in Hollywood. http://www.staged.com/video?v=x4u | ||
| Louiethelump Message Board Member Username: Louiethelump Post Number: 2871 Registered: 12-2010 |
Dar: "Romneycare is reportedly 70 pages. Obamacare is 2700 pages." A VERY valid point. Louie | ||
| Uncle_lee Message Board Member Username: Uncle_lee Post Number: 2228 Registered: 09-2009 |
Mitt's law was a state law. Federal laws should be larger than state laws. They take in more people. His federal law will increase in size. Mitt is to the left, obama is just farther to the left. | ||
| Flowder Message Board Member Username: Flowder Post Number: 19 Registered: 03-2012 |
True Flexibility- Nobody Cares! | ||
| Bud Message Board Member Username: Bud Post Number: 2162 Registered: 10-2009 |
Ft. Bragg connection!! -- Obama stops soldier from speaking Something you'll want to be aware of: Obama stops soldier from speaking ..Sent by Retired Vice Admiral Bob Scarborough, of Arlington , Va. "I wanted to give you all some disturbing information on our wonderful president. I work with the Catch-A-Dream Foundation, which provides hunting and fishing trips to children with life-threatening illnesses. This past weekend we had our annual banquet/fundraiser event in Starkville . As a part of our program, we had scheduled Sgt. 1st Class Greg Stube to come; he's a highly decorated U.S. Army Green Beret and inspirational speaker who was severely injured while deployed overseas and didn't have much of a chance for survival. Greg is stationed at Ft. Bragg , NC and received permission from his commanding officer to come speak at our function. Everything was on go until Obama made a policy that NO U.S. SERVICEMAN CAN SPEAK AT ANY FAITH-BASED PUBLIC EVENTS ANYMORE. Needless to say, Greg had to cancel his speaking event with us. Didn't know if anyone else was aware of this new policy. You're just starting to see the Obamanation. This is just how the Nazis did it in the 1930s -- slowly, one step at a time. This should be forwarded to everyone regardless of party affiliation! We have lost 50% of our freedom of speech in the last 2 years. The news media is not allowed to print anything negative about this evil Obama. ARE YOU STILL GOING TO REELECT HIM??????????? Robert D. Sinacola COL (Ret), AVN, USAR Thanks To ALL Who Served And Are Serving.. Please Pray For Our Troops And Leaders. God Bless America ... Land That I love | ||
| Naa_collector Message Board Member Username: Naa_collector Post Number: 6397 Registered: 06-2009 |
I am utterly amazed that President Obama still seems to have so much support. WHY? It will be curious when the polling ends and people have to commit themselves to actual voting. Our country is in trouble if Obama even does partly well. | ||
| Chopprs Message Board Member Username: Chopprs Post Number: 6845 Registered: 09-2009 |
Many reasons. Sheeple watch MSNBC and CNN and they are told he is great. They look no further so they believe it. Anyone that has a connection with the Democratic Party knows that if they want something it is a mere, "How much will it cost me" and it gets done. I DO NOT want to hear the Republicans do it too because though they may, the entire Democratic machine is based on this way of doing business, even in my small town! Then we have the Welfare state that gets "Obama Bux" they will ALL blindly follow him and his free money directly into the flames of the Sun and beyond with no rhime or reason other that the life long free ride.....they are the same ones that call for the execution of Zimmerman with no facts other than a Black man died. THIS ALONE is evidence enough to linch a man. Same retarded mentality! | ||
| Flowder Message Board Member Username: Flowder Post Number: 65 Registered: 03-2012 |
Does this mean the mens army choir can no longer come to the local southern baptist church? gives new meaning to "I saw the light" | ||
| Uncle_lee Message Board Member Username: Uncle_lee Post Number: 2328 Registered: 09-2009 |
+1 on Chopprs. They are eating the fatted calf and they don't want to give it up. Along with that, there are a LOT of green people that will vote for him again. •••• | ||
| Uncle_lee Message Board Member Username: Uncle_lee Post Number: 2329 Registered: 09-2009 |
Stop, hold it, quit, let's get serious for just a minute. Check out Whitehorse's new avatar. I found ONE good thing about him/her/it. •••• | ||
| Naa_collector Message Board Member Username: Naa_collector Post Number: 6426 Registered: 06-2009 |
So, back to Obama's original comment to the Russian: I believe Obama 100%. Not having a job after the election will make Obama VERY Flexible. He'll be able to set his own schedule. Play golf whenever he wants. Go on numerous vacations. Spout off at the microphone to raving idiots who love him. Oh wait, that's what he does now. Hmm. Well, I guess his job will be what he does now, except for not being able to embarrass the American people to leaders of other countries. That works for me. | ||
| Naa_collector Message Board Member Username: Naa_collector Post Number: 6472 Registered: 06-2009 |
When the President is away, the secret agents play! http://www.ksl.com/index.php?nid=124&sid=19984253&title=misconduct-alleged-against-secret-service-agents-&s_cid=featured-1 | ||
| Naa_collector Message Board Member Username: Naa_collector Post Number: 6474 Registered: 06-2009 |
Wow, the "secret agents" got busted because they refused to pay a hooker. Whoops! What a great example of the Obama Administration foreign AFFAIRS policy. HAHAHA. http://www.nydailynews.com/news/politics/secret-service-agents-busted-refused-pay-hooker-source-article-1.1061657 | ||
| Bud Message Board Member Username: Bud Post Number: 2177 Registered: 10-2009 |
Did any of the hookers remember a guy by the name of Bill Clinton? | ||
| Chopprs Message Board Member Username: Chopprs Post Number: 6893 Registered: 09-2009 |
.....no but they remember Hillary. "He" didn't pay either! | ||
| Naa_collector Message Board Member Username: Naa_collector Post Number: 6476 Registered: 06-2009 |
Bill Clinton did not have sex with that hooker! | ||
| Westerly1965 Message Board Member Username: Westerly1965 Post Number: 2536 Registered: 09-2010 |
"....no but they remember Hillary. "He" didn't pay either!" ~ Hahahahahahahaha she is one ugly woman that's for sure! |
